וְאִי לָא – אִיעֲרוּמֵי קָא מַעֲרִים.

But if this field is not of any distinct quality, he is certainly trying to employ an artifice. His plan is to then purchase another plot of land from this owner, one that does border on the field of a neighbor. By first buying the plot in the middle, he is trying to establish himself as a neighbor so that the other neighbors will not have the first right of purchase relative to him. Therefore, the neighbors may prevent him from buying the second plot of land.

מַתָּנָה לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא. אֲמַר אַמֵימָר: אִי כְּתַב לֵיהּ אַחֲרָיוּת – אִית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

The Gemara continues to discuss the halakha of one whose field borders that of his neighbor. With regard to a gift, it is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor, as one can give a gift to whomever he chooses. Ameimar said: If he wrote a property guarantee to the recipient of the gift that if the field is seized for payment of a debt of the giver the giver of the gift will compensate the recipient for his loss, it is subject to the halakha of one whose field borders of the field of his neighbor.

מָכַר כָּל נְכָסָיו לְאֶחָד – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא. לַבְּעָלִים הָרִאשׁוֹנִים – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא. זְבַן מִנָּכְרִי וְזַבֵּין לְנָכְרִי – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

If a seller sold all his property to a single person, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor, as the seller is not required to leave out one particular field if the buyer is acquiring all his property. Similarly, if the seller sold it back to the previous owners, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor. If a buyer bought a field from a gentile or a seller sold a field to a gentile, this purchase or sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor.

זְבַן מִנָּכְרִי – דְּאָמַר לֵיהּ: אֲרִי אַבְרָחִי לָךְ מִמִּצְרָא. זַבֵּין לְנָכְרִי – נָכְרִי וַדַּאי לָאו בַּר ״וְעָשִׂיתָ הַיָּשָׁר וְהַטּוֹב״ הוּא. שַׁמּוּתֵי וַדַּאי מְשַׁמְתִּינַן לֵיהּ, עַד דִּמְקַבֵּל עֲלֵיהּ כָּל אוֹנְסֵי דְּאָתֵי לֵיהּ מֵחֲמָתֵיהּ.

The Gemara clarifies this ruling: If a buyer bought the field from a gentile it does not apply, as he can say to the neighbor: It is better for you that I bought the field, as I have chased away a lion for you from the border; since the neighbor certainly prefers having a Jewish neighbor to having a gentile neighbor. If a seller sold a field to a gentile, the gentile is certainly not bound by the command of: “And you shall do that which is right and good in the eyes of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:18). The gentile is therefore under no obligation to refrain from purchasing this land. Nevertheless, we certainly excommunicate the one who sold it to the gentile until he accepts upon himself responsibility for all damage resulting from accidents that might befall the neighbor on the gentile’s account.

מַשְׁכַּנְתָּא לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא, דַּאֲמַר רַב אַשִׁי: אֲמַרוּ לִי סָבֵי דִּמְתָא מְחַסְיָא: מַאי מַשְׁכַּנְתָּא? דִּשְׁכוּנָה גַּבֵּיהּ. מַאי נַפְקָא מִינָּהּ? לְדִינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

The Gemara continues: If he sold a field previously given as a mortgage to the one to whom it was mortgaged, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor, as Rav Ashi said: The elders of the town of Mata Meḥasya said to me: What is the meaning of the word mortgage [mashkanta]? It means that it resides [shekhuna] with the one to whom it was mortgaged. What difference does it make what the word means? The Gemara answers: It is relevant with regard to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor in that the person to whom the field is mortgaged has more rights than bordering neighbors, as he lays claim to a measure of ownership over the land.

לִמְכּוֹר בְּרָחוֹק וְלִגְאוֹל בְּקָרוֹב, בְּרַע וְלִגְאוֹל בְּיָפֶה – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

If one sought to sell a distant field and to redeem, i.e., purchase for himself, a close one, or if he sold a bad one to redeem a good one, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor. Rather, he may sell his field whenever he has the opportunity.

לְכַרְגָּא וְלִמְזוֹנֵי וְלִקְבוּרָה – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא. דְּאָמְרִי נְהַרְדְּעָא: לְכַרְגָּא, לִמְזוֹנֵי וְלִקְבוּרָה מְזַבְּנִינַן בְּלָא אַכְרַזְתָּא. לְאִשָּׁה וּלְיַתְמֵי וּלְשׁוּתָּפֵי – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

Likewise, if he sells his field to pay for necessities, such as for taxes, for his wife and daughters’ sustenance, or for the burial of one of his family members, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor. This is because the Sages of Neharde’a said: For taxes, for sustenance, and for burial we sell a field without a proclamation, as such matters are pressing and urgent and should not be delayed out of consideration for the rights of a bordering neighbor. Similarly, if he sold the field to a woman, who does not usually chase after vendors, or to orphans, or to his partners, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor.

שְׁכֵינֵי הָעִיר וּשְׁכֵינֵי שָׂדֶה – שְׁכֵינֵי הָעִיר קוֹדְמִין.

If various individuals have equal rights to the field, such as both are bordering neighbors, but some of them are neighbors whose fields are adjacent to his on the side of the city, i.e., their fields are between the city and the field being sold; and others are neighbors whose fields are adjacent to his on the side of the field, i.e., their fields are between the field being sold and the area further from the city, the neighbors whose fields are adjacent to his on the side of the city receive precedence.

שָׁכֵן וְתַלְמִיד חָכָם – תַּלְמִיד חָכָם קוֹדֵם. קָרוֹב וְתַלְמִיד חָכָם – תַּלְמִיד חָכָם קוֹדֵם. אִיבַּעֲיָא לְהוּ: שָׁכֵן וְקָרוֹב מַאי? תָּא שְׁמַע: ״טוֹב שָׁכֵן קָרוֹב מֵאָח רָחוֹק״.

If one is a regular neighbor and the other is a Torah scholar, the Torah scholar receives precedence. If one is a relative and the other is a Torah scholar, here too, the Torah scholar receives precedence. A dilemma was raised before the Sages: With regard to a neighbor and a relative, what is the halakha? Which of them takes precedence? The Gemara suggests: Come and hear an answer from the following verse: “Better a neighbor who is near than a brother who is far” (Proverbs 27:10).

הָנֵי זוּזֵי טָבֵי וְהָנֵי זוּזֵי תְּקוּלֵי – לֵית בֵּיהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא. הָנֵי צַיְירִי וְהָנֵי שְׁרֵי – לֵית בֵּיהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

If two people sought to acquire a field, and these coins that the first produces for payment are good dinars, and those coins that the second uses are weighed dinars, which are preferable to the good dinars, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor, as the owner can say he prefers the superior quality coins. If these coins were wrapped up and those were loose, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders on the field his neighbor, as he may sell his field to the one whose money is ready to be counted.

אֲמַר: אֵיזִיל וְאֶטְרַח וְאַיְיתֵי זוּזֵי – לָא נָטְרִינַן לֵיהּ. אֲמַר: אֵיזִיל אַיְיתֵי זוּזֵי, חָזֵינַן; אִי גַּבְרָא דַּאֲמִיד הוּא, דְּאָזֵיל וּמַיְיתֵי זוּזֵי – נָטְרִינַן לֵיהּ. וְאִי לָא – לָא נָטְרִינַן לֵיהּ.

If the neighbor said: I will go and expend effort and bring money, we do not wait for him, despite his status as a bordering neighbor, if someone else is available who is prepared to pay immediately. If he said: I will go bring money, we see what his financial status is: If he is a person who is assessed as one who can go and bring money without delay, we wait for him, but if not, we do not wait for him.

אַרְעָא דְּחַד וּבָתֵּי דְּחַד – מָרֵי אַרְעָא מְעַכֵּב אַמָּרֵי בָתֵּי, מָרֵי בָתֵּי לָא מְעַכֵּב אַמָּרֵי דְּאַרְעָא. אַרְעָא דְּחַד וְדִיקְלֵי דְּחַד – מָרֵי דְּאַרְעָא מָצֵי מְעַכֵּב אַמָּרֵי דִּקְלֵי, מָרֵי דִּיקְלֵי לָא מָצֵי מְעַכֵּב אַמָּרֵי דְּאַרְעָא.

If the land belonged to one person and the houses on the land belonged to another one, the owner of the land prevents the owner of the houses from selling his houses to someone else, as he has the first right of purchase. By contrast, the owner of the houses does not prevent the owner of the land from selling his land, as one can change his place of residence with relative ease, so he is not considered tied to the land. Similarly, if the land belonged to one and its palm trees to another one, the owner of the land can prevent the owner of the palm trees from selling the trees to another, but the owner of the palm trees cannot prevent the owner of the land from selling his land to another.

אַרְעָא לְבָתֵּי וְאַרְעָא לְזַרְעָא – יִשּׁוּב עָדִיף, וְלֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

If two people wanted to purchase the land, but one desired the land for building houses and the other wished to purchase the land for planting, the settling of the land through construction of houses is preferable, and this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor. Therefore, he may sell to the one who wants to build a house there, even if he is not a bordering neighbor and the other potential buyer is.

אַפְסֵיק מְשׁוּנִיתָא אוֹ רִיכְבָּא דְּדִיקְלָא, חָזֵינָא: אִם יָכוֹל לְהַכְנִיס בָּהּ אֲפִילּוּ תֶּלֶם אֶחָד – אִית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא; וְאִי לָא – לֵית בָּהּ מִשּׁוּם דִּינָא דְּבַר מִצְרָא.

If a jagged edge of rock or a row of palm trees served as a barrier between two bordering fields, we see whether any open space exists. If the owner of the adjacent field can insert even a single furrow there that comes into contact with the other field, this sale is subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor. But if sufficient space for a furrow does not exist, this sale is not subject to the halakha of one whose field borders the field of his neighbor.

הָנֵי אַרְבָּעָה בְּנֵי מִצְרָנֵי, דְּקַדֵּים חַד מִינַּיְיהוּ וּזְבֵין – זְבִינֵיהּ זְבִינֵי. וְאִי כּוּלְּהוּ אָתוּ בַּהֲדֵי הֲדָדֵי – פָּלְגוּ לָהּ בְּקַרְנַזִיל.

In a case of those four bordering neighbors who surround a field that is for sale from all four sides, if one of them preceded the others and purchased it, his purchase is a valid purchase and the others cannot object. And if they all came simultaneously to purchase it, then they divide the plot of land, with two bisecting diagonal lines