מַאי תּוֹרָה? מִדְרַשׁ תּוֹרָה. וְהָנֵי מִילֵּי – דַּאֲמַר לָהּ ״תָּנֵינָא״, אֲבָל אָמַר לָהּ ״תַּנָּא אֲנָא״ – עַד דְּתָנֵי הִילְכְתָא סִפְרָא וְסִיפְרֵי וְתוֹסֶפְתָּא.

What is the meaning of: Torah, that Rabbi Yoḥanan said? It is homiletic interpretation of the Torah. And this statement applies only if he said to her: I study [taneina]. But if he says to her: I am a tanna [tanna ana], she is not betrothed unless he studies halakha, i.e., Mishna, Sifra and Sifrei, and Tosefta.

״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי תַּלְמִיד״ – אֵין אוֹמְרִים כְּשִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן עַזַּאי וּכְשִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן זוֹמָא, אֶלָּא: כָּל שֶׁשּׁוֹאֲלִין אוֹתוֹ בְּכָל מָקוֹם דָּבָר אֶחָד בְּתַלְמוּדוֹ וְאוֹמְרוֹ, וַאֲפִילּוּ בְּמַסֶּכְתָּא דְּכַלָּה. ״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי חָכָם״ – אֵין אוֹמְרִים כְּחַכְמֵי יַבְנֶה, כְּרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא וַחֲבֵירָיו, אֶלָּא: כָּל שֶׁשּׁוֹאֲלִים אוֹתוֹ דְּבַר חָכְמָה בְּכָל מָקוֹם וְאוֹמְרָהּ.

If a man says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a student of Torah, one does not say that he must be a student who is scholarly like Shimon ben Azzai or like Shimon ben Zoma, who were called students despite their great knowledge, as they were never ordained. Rather, it means anyone who, when he is asked one matter in any topic of his studies, responds appropriately and can say what he has learned, and this suffices even if his statement was in the tractate of Kalla. Similarly, if a man says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a scholar, one does not say that he must be like the scholars of Yavne, like Rabbi Akiva and his colleagues. Rather, it is referring to anyone who, when he is asked about a matter of wisdom on any topic related to the Torah, responds appropriately and can say what he has learned.

״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי גִבּוֹר״ – אֵין אוֹמְרִים כְּאַבְנֵר בֶּן נֵר, וּכְיוֹאָב בֶּן צְרוּיָה, אֶלָּא כָּל שֶׁחֲבֵירָיו מִתְיָרְאִים מִמֶּנּוּ מִפְּנֵי גְּבוּרָתוֹ. ״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי עָשִׁיר״ – אֵין אוֹמְרִים כְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן חַרְסוֹם וּכְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן עֲזַרְיָה, אֶלָּא כָּל שֶׁבְּנֵי עִירוֹ מְכַבְּדִים אוֹתוֹ מִפְּנֵי עוֹשְׁרוֹ.

If a man says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am strong, one does not say that he must be as strong as Abner ben Ner, King Saul’s cousin and general, or as strong as Joab ben Zeruiah, King David’s nephew and general. Rather, it means anyone of whom others are afraid due to his strength. If a man says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am wealthy, one does not say he must be as wealthy as Rabbi Elazar ben Ḥarsom or as wealthy as Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, but rather it can refer to anyone who is honored by the members of his town due to his wealth.

״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי צַדִּיק״ – אֲפִילּוּ רָשָׁע גָּמוּר מְקוּדֶּשֶׁת, שֶׁמָּא הִרְהֵר תְּשׁוּבָה בְּדַעְתּוֹ. ״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי רָשָׁע״ – אֲפִילּוּ צַדִּיק גָּמוּר מְקוּדֶּשֶׁת, שֶׁמָּא הִרְהֵר דְּבַר עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה בְּדַעְתּוֹ.

If one says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a righteous man, then even if he was a completely wicked man she is betrothed, as perhaps in the meantime he had thoughts of repentance in his mind and is now righteous. Similarly, if one says to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a wicked man, then even if he was a completely righteous man she is betrothed, as perhaps he had thoughts of idol worship in his mind, a serious sin that would earn him the label of wicked.

עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים חָכְמָה יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֶחָד כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים יוֹפִי יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה יְרוּשָׁלַיִם, וְאֶחָד כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים עֲשִׁירוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה רוֹמִי, וְאֶחָד כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים עֲנִיּוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה בָּבֶל, וְאֶחָד כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים גַּסּוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה עֵילָם, וְאֶחָד כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ.

§ Apropos the discussion with regard to various attributes, the Gemara cites a related statement: Ten kav of wisdom descended to the world; Eretz Yisrael took nine of them and all the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of beauty descended to the world; Jerusalem took nine and all the rest of the world in its entirety took one. Ten kav of wealth descended to the world; Rome took nine and all the rest of the world in its entirety took one. Ten kav of poverty descended to the world; Babylonia took nine and all the rest of the world in its entirety took one. Ten kav of arrogance descended to the world; Eilam took nine and all the rest of the world in its entirety took one.

וְגַסּוּת לְבָבֶל לָא נָחֵית? וְהָכְתִיב: ״וָאֶשָּׂא עֵינַי וָאֵרֶא וְהִנֵּה שְׁתַּיִם נָשִׁים יוֹצְאוֹת וְרוּחַ בְּכַנְפֵיהֶם וְלָהֵנָּה כְנָפַיִם כְּכַנְפֵי הַחֲסִידָה וַתִּשֶּׂנָה אֶת הָאֵיפָה בֵּין הָאָרֶץ וּבֵין הַשָּׁמָיִם. וָאֹמַר אֶל הַמַּלְאָךְ הַדֹּבֵר בִּי אָנָה הֵמָּה מוֹלִכוֹת אֶת הָאֵיפָה. וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלַי לִבְנוֹת לָה בַיִת בְּאֶרֶץ שִׁנְעָר״ וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: זוֹ חֲנוּפָּה וְגַסּוּת הָרוּחַ שֶׁיָּרְדוּ לְבָבֶל!

The Gemara asks: But did arrogance not descend to Babylonia? But isn’t it written: “Then I lifted my eyes and saw, and behold there came forth two women, and the wind was in their wings, for they had wings like the wings of a stork. And they lifted up the measure between the earth and the heaven. Then I said to the angel that spoke with me: ‘To where do they take the measure?’ And he said to me: ‘To build her a house in the land of Shinar’” (Zechariah 5:9–11). And Rabbi Yoḥanan says: This refers to flattery and arrogance that descended to Babylonia, i.e., Shinar. This indicates that arrogance reached Babylonia as well.

אִין, לְהָכָא נְחֵית, וְאִשְׁתַּרְבּוּבֵי הוּא דְאִשְׁתַּרְבּוּבֵי לְהָתָם. דַּיְקָא נַמִי, דְּקָתָנֵי: ״לִבְנוֹת לָה בַיִת״. שְׁמַע מִינָּהּ.

The Gemara answers: Yes, it descended to here, to Babylonia, and it made its way to there, to Eilam. The language of the verse is also precise, as it teaches: “To build her a house,” which indicates that the original intention was to build a house in Babylonia, but it was not built there. The Gemara comments: Conclude from it that arrogance did not remain in Babylonia.

אִינִי? וְהָאָמַר מָר: סִימָן לְגַסּוּת – עֲנִיּוּת, וַעֲנִיּוּת בְּבָבֶל הוּא דְּאִיכָּא! מַאי עֲנִיּוּת? עֲנִיּוּת דְּתוֹרָה, דִּכְתִיב: ״אָחוֹת לָנוּ קְטַנָּה וְשָׁדַיִם אֵין לָהּ״, וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: זוֹ עֵילָם, שֶׁזָּכְתָה לִלְמוֹד וְלֹא זָכְתָה לְלַמֵּד.

The Gemara further asks: Is that so? But didn’t the Master say: A sign of arrogance is poverty, and there is poverty in Babylonia, and not in Eilam. The Gemara answers: To what kind of poverty is this referring? It is poverty with regard to Torah, which was characteristic of Eilam. As it is written: “We have a little sister, and she has no breasts” (Song of Songs 8:8), and Rabbi Yoḥanan said: This refers to Eilam, whose inhabitants merited to learn but did not merit to teach. They did not produce Torah scholars capable of imparting their wisdom to others.

עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים גְּבוּרָה יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלוּ פַּרְסִיִּים וכו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים כִּנִּים יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה מָדַי כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים כְּשָׁפִים יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה מִצְרַיִם כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים נְגָעִים יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלוּ חֲזִירִים כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים זְנוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה עֲרָבִיָּא כו׳.

The Gemara returns to its list of endowments of various groups: Ten kav of strength descended to the world; the Persians took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of lice descended to the world; Media took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of witchcraft descended to the world; Egypt took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of plagues descended to the world; pigs, which carry disease, took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of licentiousness descended to the world; Arabia took nine and the rest of the world took one.

עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים עַזּוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלָה מֵישָׁן כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים שִׂיחָה יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלוּ נָשִׁים כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים שִׁכְרוּת יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלוּ כּוּשִׁים כו׳. עֲשָׂרָה קַבִּים שֵׁינָה יָרְדוּ לָעוֹלָם, תִּשְׁעָה נָטְלוּ עֲבָדִים, וְאֶחָד נָטְלוּ כָּל הָעוֹלָם כּוּלּוֹ.

Ten kav of brazenness descended to the world; Meishan, near Babylonia, took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of conversation descended to the world; women took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of drunkenness descended to the world; the Kushites took nine and the rest of the world took one. Ten kav of sleep descended to the world; slaves took nine and all the rest of the world in its entirety took one.

מתני׳ ״עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֲנִי כֹּהֵן״ וְנִמְצָא לֵוִי, ״לֵוִי״ וְנִמְצָא כֹּהֵן. ״נָתִין״ וְנִמְצָא מַמְזֵר, ״מַמְזֵר״ וְנִמְצָא נָתִין. ״בֶּן עִיר״ וְנִמְצָא בֶּן כְּרַךְ, ״בֶּן כְּרַךְ״ וְנִמְצָא בֶּן עִיר. ״עַל מְנָת שֶׁבֵּיתִי קָרוֹב לַמֶּרְחָץ״ וְנִמְצָא רָחוֹק, ״רָחוֹק״ וְנִמְצָא קָרוֹב.

If one said to a woman: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a priest, and he was found to be a Levite; or if he said: A Levite, and he was found to be a priest; or if he said: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a Gibeonite, a people prohibited by rabbinic law from marrying into the congregation, i.e., from marrying a Jew of fit lineage, and he was found to be a mamzer, who is prohibited by Torah law to marry into the congregation; or he said: A mamzer, and he was found to be a Gibeonite; or if he said: Be betrothed to me on the condition that I am a resident of a small town, and he was found to be a resident of a large city; or he said: A resident of a city, and he was found to be a resident of a town; or if he said: Be betrothed to me on the condition that my house is close to the bathhouse, and it was found to be far; or he said: Far from the bathhouse, and it was found to be close, she is not betrothed.

עַל מְנָת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ בַּת אוֹ שִׁפְחָה מְגוּדֶּלֶת וְאֵין לוֹ, אוֹ עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֵין לוֹ וְיֵשׁ לוֹ. עַל מְנָת שֶׁאֵין לוֹ בָּנִים וְיֵשׁ לוֹ, אוֹ עַל מְנָת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ וְאֵין לוֹ. וּבְכוּלָּם אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאָמְרָה: ״בְּלִבִּי הָיָה לְהִתְקַדֵּשׁ לוֹ אַף עַל פִּי כֵן״, אֵינָהּ מְקוּדֶּשֶׁת. וְכֵן הִיא שֶׁהִטְעַתּוּ.

Or if he said that she is betrothed to him on the condition that he has a grown daughter or a maidservant, and he does not have one, or on the condition that he does not have one and he has one; or on the condition that he has no sons, and he has sons, or on the condition that he has sons and he does not have sons, then she is not betrothed. And in all these cases, despite the fact that she later stated: I intended to become betrothed to him nevertheless, whether or not he fulfilled the condition, she is not betrothed. And similarly, if it was she who misled him by making the betrothal conditional upon a statement of hers that turned out to be incorrect, the betrothal will not take effect.

גמ׳ הַהוּא גַּבְרָא דְּזַבֵּין לְנִכְסֵיהּ אַדַּעְתָּא לְמֵיסַק לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וּבְעִידָּנָא דְּזַבֵּין לָא אֲמַר וְלָא מִידֵּי. אֲמַר רָבָא: הָוֵי דְּבָרִים שֶׁבַּלֵּב, וּדְבָרִים שֶׁבַּלֵּב – אֵינָם דְּבָרִים. מְנָא לֵיהּ לְרָבָא הָא? אִילֵימָא מֵהָא דִּתְנַן.

The Gemara relates: There was a certain man who sold his property with the intention of ascending to Eretz Yisrael, but at the time that he sold the property he did not say anything with regard to his intention. Ultimately, he did not ascend to Eretz Yisrael, and he wished to renege on the sale. Rava said: Since he did not explicitly state that he was selling his property on the condition that he ascend to Eretz Yisrael, that is an unspoken matter that remained in the heart, and unspoken matters that remain in the heart are not significant matters. The Gemara asks: From where does Rava learn this principle? If we say it is from that which we learn in a baraita: